Key Moments
- Under Armour Inc A (UAA) is rated Strong Sell across daily, weekly, and monthly signals at $5.87, with an RSI of 33.9 approaching oversold levels.
- Revenue has fallen for three consecutive fiscal years while net income moved from a $232M profit to a $496M loss, pointing to structural, not cyclical, weakness.
- Analysts now expect no meaningful revenue recovery until at least H2 FY2028, as the end of the Stephen Curry partnership adds pressure to an already fragile turnaround.
Technical Picture Signals Persistent Weakness
Under Armour Inc A (NYSE: UAA) is currently trading at $5.87 and is showing Strong Sell indications across daily, weekly, and monthly timeframes. The daily relative strength index stands at 33.9, putting the stock close to oversold territory.
The share price has dropped 14.2% in just one week following a downgrade from Barclays to Underweight with a $5.00 price target. This pullback is occurring against a backdrop of mounting concerns that the departure of Stephen Curry is adding further strain to the company’s already challenging turnaround efforts.
Fundamentals Deteriorate as Losses Deepen
Recent financial trends highlight a company under substantial pressure. Revenue has declined for three straight fiscal years, from $5.70B in FY2024 to $5.16B in FY2025 and then to $4.97B in FY2026. Over the same period, net income shifted from a $232M profit to a $496M loss, underscoring a significant deterioration rather than a temporary setback.
For FQ1 2027, reported on August 10, 2026, revenue came in at $1.10B, slightly below the $1.11B consensus estimate and representing a -3% year-on-year decline. Adjusted EPS of $0.05 exceeded expectations of $0.02, but that upside was aided in part by a one-time tariff refund, raising questions about the sustainability of that earnings support.
Curry’s Departure Undermines Brand Positioning
The strategic impact of Stephen Curry’s exit is a central concern. An analyst SWOT analysis from May 2025 had already identified the end of the partnership as both a significant weakness and a material threat. Curry served as the core of Under Armour’s basketball identity and helped support a premium brand perception. His move to a rival leaves a gap that is likely to demand considerable time and marketing investment to address.
Analyst sentiment has shifted quickly. Barclays cut its rating to Underweight with a $5 price target, Stifel downgraded the stock to Hold with a $6 target, and UBS, which maintains a Buy rating, reduced its target from $10 to $9. The current consensus view anticipates no meaningful revenue inflection until at least the second half of FY2028, implying investors may face at least two more years of pressure before any potential improvement.
Valuation: Cheap for a Reason?
A fair value model places Under Armour Inc A (UAA) at $8.47, suggesting a 44.3% upside from the current price if the assumptions behind the model are realized. The stock trades at a forward P/E of just 4.7x, and projections call for a return to profitability with EPS reaching $1.25 by FY2027. The company’s liquid assets remain above its short-term liabilities, which keeps near-term bankruptcy risk low.
From a technical standpoint, several indicators point to oversold conditions, with the Commodity Channel Index at -247.9 and StochRSI at 0.0, hinting that a short-term rebound is possible. Key daily support levels are identified at $5.77 (S1) and $5.43 (S2).
Key Metrics: Knife-Catching Risk on Display
The following table summarizes the current risk-reward profile based on the provided metrics:
| Metric | Value | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.87 | Near 52W low ($4.13) |
| Revenue Growth | -3.6% | Declining |
| Net Income (LTM) | -$496M | Deep losses |
| Fair Value Upside | 44.3% | Attractive if model is right |
| Analyst Target Upside | -2.0% | Wall Street sees no upside |
| RSI (Daily) | 33.9 | Near oversold |
| Debt/Equity | 96.4% | Leveraged |
| Beta | 1.65 | Highly volatile |
The stark contrast between the 44.3% upside implied by the fair value model and the -2.0% implied by analyst price targets encapsulates the core debate. The model embeds a successful turnaround; current analyst positioning reflects skepticism that such a recovery will materialize as projected.





